Multi-disciplinary approaches to Autism

I spent several years working with children diagnosed with Autism, and LOVED it. It's some of the hardest work I've ever done (Freddie, if you have the link to the Salon article, that'd be faboo), it's definitely not for everyone, and Autism (or Autism Spectrum Disorders - ASDs, such as Asperger's Syndrome, Rett's Syndrome, Autism Spectrum Disorder - I know, don't get me started - etc. etc.) is a difficult disorder to explain, much less treat. I worked in several different fields, using quite a few different frameworks and applying different skill sets under these frameworks: music therapy, applied behavior analysis (ABA), Lovaas, cognitive development, Floortime, socio-emotional development, on and on and on.

Today there's an article in the NYT about Autism, and each time the mainstream media spotlights the disorder, I alternate between thrilled and discouraged. It is a difficult disorder to spotlight in that it's manifested ever so differently from person to person - it's a spectrum disorder and a syndrome so a person diagnosed with ASD and the different syndromes manifests a different set of skills and disabilities, with different levels of severity in those areas. No two children with ASD present exactly the same. When an article or news story appears, it brings levels of awareness abou a disorder that is grossly on the rise for reasons unknown, widely misunderstood (Rain Man, while a start, is one of the most high-functioning people with Autism I've ever seen - possibly second only to Temple Grandin, whom I met a few years ago and is remarkable in so many ways and a beacon of hope for so many parents) but also does not do enough research to present a story that may leave the reader or viewer more confused - sadly without them ever realizing their confusion. Often it presents ABA as the be-all, end-all of Autism intervention.

This article bemoans the lack of current, pure, scientific research of the effectiveness of ABA Autism because the parents often interfere with the would-be effectiveness of this research by accessing multi-disciplinary treatments. In an online article that covers 4 pages, today's article mentions numerous treatments and interventions and gives them cursory, derogatory explanations, or no explanation at all. Sensory Integration is not a wild, unknown, fringe-treatment, as portrayed in the article - there's years of research to back it up, not to mention testimonials from parents whose child never showed any interest in playing even near other children in the sandbox during recess because they couldn't tolerate the feeling of the sand (I, personally, totally understand that one - sand on my feet triggers a gag reflex). Gluten-Free, Casein-Free diets are helpful for some children, and also address sensory processing difficulties. Floortime, helps parents and children to interact with each other - a skill never previously addressed as developmentally necessary for the child or the parent. I've met families with children 7 years old, and the parents seem as emotionally distant as their children; they've never played with each other because the parents have never learned that their patience and persistence in reaching out to their children is as important for them as it is for their kiddo, and using Floortime models, these parents have interacted with their children for the first time.

I definitely understand why research is important in the treatment of any disorder. However, I also understand the need for parents to treat their children with as many interventions as possible - since Autism comes in as many colors as there are water droplets, no single treatment or combination of treatments is likely to work universally as the Cure for Autism. Many people illustrate the parents as accessing interventions as a way to manager their grief as going into overdrive. In many cases this is true - but if you look at the motivation, it's difficult to portray them as therapy-seeking maniacs who want their children to spend their whole lives in therapies. In most cases, these parents are doing whatever they can to give their children what every good parent wants to give: their child a happy, healthy life where they can live as independently as possbile to go on and do the same for their children further down the line.

3 comments:

Canopenner Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:44:00 am  

We have a child who has been diagnosed with everything from add to aspergers.

Its gotten to the point where I dont believe 1 word coming out of any psychologist's mouth. And the teachers are twice as bad. Wanting to medicate my child at every availible opportunity. We sent him to a clinic specializing in autism and asperger's and they said the same thing, "meds, meds, meds", We sent him there twice over a 3 year period and their diagnoses never changed.

After years and years of that. Ive come to accept that he just thinks "outside the box".

I no longer fear that hes going to grow up and not be self sufficient. Over the years he seemed to grow out of most of the problem behavior. Now he just shows slight facial ticks from time to time. And thats about it. Other than "abnormal thoughts" ex. wanting to make his sandwich out of swiss cheese and roast beef sans bread but with the swiss cheese outside like you would have the bread normally.

Im glad that we didnt listen to the psychologists and teachers who wanted him put on meds.

After 5 years of telling the school "no" to drugs, now he has the highest marks of any of our children(he recently changed to the middle school and these teachers say hes a great student). Funny how a change in teachers can cause his need for medication to disapeer.

Now...Im not saying these disorders dont excist. But I think its becoming the norm to misdiagnose and throw medication at all our problems. Especially when dealing with something as "fuzzy" as autism.

Wow...thats a long comment.

heatherfeather Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:10:00 pm  

Long comments... ah, the very best kind!

One of the most appalling things to me in education these days is the prevalence of teachers prescribing medication for behavior problems for students. It's ridiculous. Teachers are educators. They see tons of children and are, granted, pretty good at spotting behavioral problems that may not fit in with general snottiness, but that does not give them the training, the vision, or above all make the decisions of parenting for a specific child...

I appear to have lost my train of thought.

I'm glad you stuck it out with your kiddo. Not everyone needs therapy and meds for the entirety of their lives.

Canopenner Tuesday, December 28, 2004 10:44:00 pm  

We do have therapy for him.

But I dont think its anything steller.

1 on 1 with local psychologist. Our supposedly "normal" 15.9 year old sees him as much as his little brother.

They both like him. I think he helps and is a good guy...

Oh and thats covered under medical and doesnt get my kid a lifelong habit.

Unless its a lifelong habit of talking to people, which is a good deal.

:^)

About this blog

erratically updated for food, yarn, or other nonspecified reasons